Information presented and discussed at Council meeting is misleading the elected members
💢 👀 Information presented and discussed at Council meeting is misleading the elected members 👀 💢
Listening to the YouTube recording of the 5 March 2025 meeting to justify the Tamaki $700 million investment:
Some Councillors seem to be operating off incorrect information and saying they want to make the decision and not to put it out to feedback
(1) says we are moving to impervious (say we are going to 90% impervious)
(2) claim that on-site attenuation is $2 billion (since when!!)… I have a request in to get this explained
(3) someone says only 1,000L detention is capable per house on the small sites… that is wrong, I do 2,000 L per house and am actually choosing to do $3,000L
Some seem to know what they are talking about
Council admits they are not checking compliance well enough: Yes get on with it… achieve community responsibility
THE COST OF ONSITE MITIGATION IS BEING MISREPRESENTED.
IMPERVIOUS v PERVIOUS is being MISREPRESENTED.
